Data Scraping

Data Scraping: A Primer for Legal Professionals

1. Overview

Data scraping, in its simplest form, is the automated process of extracting data from websites or other digital sources. Imagine you need to collect information from thousands of public records, but doing it manually would take weeks. Data scraping allows a computer program to automatically visit each record, copy the relevant information, and compile it into a usable format like a spreadsheet. This practice has become increasingly common due to the sheer volume of publicly available data and the desire to analyze it for various purposes, from market research to competitive intelligence. For legal professionals, understanding data scraping is crucial because it raises significant questions about intellectual property, data privacy, and the legality of accessing and using publicly available information. It can impact litigation strategy, due diligence investigations, and regulatory compliance. Think of it like a digital version of meticulously combing through physical archives, but at a much faster and larger scale.

2. The Big Picture

Data scraping essentially automates the copy-and-paste process, but on a massive scale. Instead of a human manually copying information from web pages, a computer program (“scraper” or “bot”) is designed to do it automatically. The program identifies the specific data elements on a page (e.g., a product price, a name, an address), extracts those elements, and saves them in a structured format. The program can then repeat this process across thousands or even millions of pages.

Key concepts to understand, without getting into the technical details of how it works, include:

• Target: The source of the data. This is usually a website, but it could also be a public API (Application Programming Interface) or other online database. Think of this like a particular library or archive.
• Scraper/Bot: The software program that performs the data extraction. These can be custom-built or purchased off-the-shelf. This is analogous to a research assistant tasked with finding and copying specific documents.
• Data Fields: The specific pieces of information that are extracted. For example, if scraping an e-commerce website, the data fields might include product name, price, description, and customer reviews. These are like the specific pieces of information you need to extract from each document in the archive.
• Output Format: The format in which the extracted data is saved. This is often a spreadsheet (CSV file), a database, or a JSON file. This is like the final report or collection of documents compiled by your research assistant.

Think of it like hiring a team of researchers to manually collect information from various sources, but these researchers are computer programs working 24/7, gathering information much faster and more efficiently than any human team could. The legal questions arise when considering the terms of service of the “sources” (websites), the scope of the “research” (data extracted), and the intended use of the “collected information.”

3. Legal Implications

Data scraping presents a complex web of legal issues, primarily revolving around intellectual property, data privacy, and terms of service violations.

• IP and Copyright Concerns: Scraping content that is protected by copyright can lead to infringement claims. While factual information itself is generally not copyrightable, the way that information is organized and presented (e.g., the design of a website, the specific wording of a product description) may be protected. Scraping an entire website and replicating it elsewhere could easily infringe on copyright. Furthermore, scraping data that contains trade secrets could lead to misappropriation claims if the data is used in a way that harms the original owner. Consider this like photocopying entire books without permission; even if the facts within the book are not copyrightable, the arrangement and presentation of those facts are.

• Data Privacy and Usage Issues: Scraping personal data raises serious privacy concerns, especially under laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States. Scraping publicly available data does not automatically mean it can be used without restriction. If the scraped data contains personal information (e.g., names, addresses, email addresses), the scraper must comply with applicable privacy laws regarding its collection, storage, and use. Furthermore, the purpose for which the data is scraped is critical. Scraping for legitimate purposes, such as academic research or journalism, may be more defensible than scraping for commercial purposes that could harm individuals. The key question is whether the scraping activity violates individuals’ reasonable expectations of privacy. Think of it like collecting business cards at a conference. You have the right to possess those cards, but you have limitations on how you can use the information on them, especially if you promised you would only use the information for a certain purpose.

• Terms of Service Violations: Most websites have terms of service (TOS) that prohibit or restrict data scraping. Violating these terms can lead to legal action for breach of contract, even if the scraped data is publicly available. Courts have generally held that website TOS are enforceable contracts. The key is whether the scraper had notice of the TOS and manifested assent to them (e.g., by clicking an “I agree” button or continuing to use the website after being presented with the terms). Even if there is no explicit TOS, some courts have held that scraping can constitute trespass to chattels if it unduly burdens the website’s servers or disrupts its operations. This is analogous to entering a private property after being told not to. Even if the property is partially visible from the street, you don’t have the right to trespass on it.

• Impact on Litigation: Data scraping can significantly impact litigation in several ways. It can be used to gather evidence, conduct background checks, and monitor social media activity. However, it can also be used to harass or intimidate opponents, spread misinformation, or violate privacy laws. Lawyers must be aware of the potential legal risks and ethical considerations associated with using scraped data in litigation. They must ensure that the data was obtained legally and ethically, and that it is used in a way that complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct. For example, scraping public records to find assets of a defendant in a judgment enforcement action is likely permissible, while scraping social media profiles to gather embarrassing information about a witness might be unethical or even illegal.

4. Real-World Context

Data scraping is used by a wide range of companies and organizations across various industries.

• E-commerce: Companies like Amazon and eBay use data scraping to monitor competitor pricing, track product trends, and identify potential counterfeits. Price comparison websites also rely heavily on data scraping to provide consumers with the best deals.

• Finance: Financial institutions use data scraping to monitor market sentiment, track news events, and detect fraudulent activity. Hedge funds may use it to gather alternative data for investment analysis.

• Marketing: Marketing companies use data scraping to generate leads, build customer profiles, and track brand mentions. Social media monitoring tools rely on scraping to analyze public conversations.

• Real Estate: Real estate websites use data scraping to aggregate property listings from various sources and provide consumers with comprehensive search results.

• Legal: Law firms are increasingly using data scraping for due diligence, background checks, and investigations. For instance, they can scrape public records to identify assets, uncover hidden relationships, or track down witnesses.

Real Examples and Current Legal Issues:

• LinkedIn v. hiQ Labs: This case involved hiQ Labs, a company that scraped publicly available data from LinkedIn profiles to provide its clients with insights on employee skills and attrition. LinkedIn argued that hiQ’s scraping violated its terms of service and constituted trespass to chattels. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals initially ruled in favor of hiQ, holding that publicly available data is not “private” and that LinkedIn could not prevent hiQ from scraping it. However, the Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit to consider whether the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) applied. This case highlights the tension between the right to access publicly available data and the right of website owners to control access to their platforms. [Reuters - https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/linkedin-hiq-labs-lawsuit-over-data-scraping-takes-new-turn-2022-04-18/]
• Clearview AI: Clearview AI is a company that has scraped billions of images from the internet to create a facial recognition database. The company has been sued in multiple jurisdictions for violating privacy laws and infringing on individuals’ rights to control their personal data. This case raises serious questions about the legality of scraping facial images without consent and using them for commercial purposes. [ACLU - https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/clearview-ai-is-a-nightmare-scenario-come-to-life/]
• Copyright Claims: Websites and content creators are increasingly using copyright law to protect their data from being scraped. They argue that scraping constitutes copyright infringement if it involves copying and distributing copyrighted content, even if the content is publicly available. This is especially true if the scraped data is used to create a competing product or service. [Lexology - https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b2938961-2530-4304-891b-b009100c1e8a]

5. Sources

• Sandvig, Christian, et al. “Auditing Algorithms: On the Feasibility of Detecting Discrimination in Internet Search Results.” Social Science Research Network, 2014. [SSRN - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2405063] (While this paper focuses on algorithm auditing, it discusses methods of data collection that are relevant to understanding scraping techniques).
• United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Data Privacy in the Age of Big Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O., 2013. [U.S. Government Publishing Office - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-113shrg81822/html/CHRG-113shrg81822.htm] (This congressional hearing provides valuable insights into the privacy implications of big data and data collection practices).
• LinkedIn v. hiQ Labs, Inc., 93 F.4th 914 (9th Cir. 2024). [FindLaw - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1896001.html] (Provides the legal precedent for data scraping legality.)
• O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown, 2016. (Though not directly about scraping, it discusses the ethical implications of using large datasets, which are often gathered using scraping methods).
• Clearview AI Lawsuits (Various). Search for legal filings and news articles related to Clearview AI’s data scraping practices to understand the legal challenges associated with scraping biometric data. (Example: ACLU Lawsuit against Clearview AI [ACLU - https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-sues-clearview-ai-over-mass-surveillance-practices])
• Web Scraping Best Practices [Zyte - https://www.zyte.com/blog/web-scraping-best-practices/] (This article, from a company that provides web scraping services, offers practical advice on ethical and legal scraping practices.)
• Terms of Service (TOS) Examples: Review the TOS of major websites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Amazon) to understand their policies on data scraping.

This overview provides a foundational understanding of data scraping for legal professionals. As the technology evolves and legal precedents continue to develop, staying informed about these issues will be crucial for navigating the complex legal landscape surrounding data acquisition and usage. Remember to consult with experts in data privacy and intellectual property law when dealing with specific cases involving data scraping.

---

Generated for legal professionals. 1797 words. Published 2025-10-26.